1 |
Minutes of meeting 12/02/2001 @ 3pm |
2 |
Location: UKC Computer Science Meeting Room |
3 |
|
4 |
Present: ab11, ajm4, pjm2, tdb1 |
5 |
|
6 |
The meeting began with a review of the last two weeks, as |
7 |
all members were not present at the last meeting. However, a |
8 |
lot of these points were covered during the last minutes. AJ |
9 |
told the group about the new "service checks" that were |
10 |
implemented in the Filter system. These allowed checking of |
11 |
typical system services (WWW, FTP, SMTP, etc), the results |
12 |
being wrapped in XML in a heartbeat packet. |
13 |
|
14 |
Tim had implemented the Queue monitoring system, and gave |
15 |
the group brief details of the packet layout. Ash requested |
16 |
some help with compiling a C++ socket library, which would |
17 |
hopefully allow the network parts to be hooked into the |
18 |
host. He also said development of the windows parts were |
19 |
progressing, but that the network stuff was also needed |
20 |
there. |
21 |
|
22 |
Discussions were started about how the data from the service |
23 |
checks would be displayed. Tim and Paul discussed if any |
24 |
historical data could be generated, and Ash suggested a CGI |
25 |
script. Tim pointed out that there wasn't even any basic |
26 |
functionality in a local client yet, and this needed to be |
27 |
done first. He suggested the local client just pump data out |
28 |
to some text form (be it, csv, xml, html, etc) in the first |
29 |
instance, and then expand this afterwards. |
30 |
|
31 |
Over the next week, or so, the group agreed that things |
32 |
should be pulled together. AJ said he would bring the |
33 |
client, conient, to a complete point, and put some of the |
34 |
"funky" features on hold. Paul said he would finish of the |
35 |
database reports, and look at archiving/cleaning the |
36 |
database. Tim said he would look at the overall design of |
37 |
the local client, and implement it with a very modular |
38 |
design. Ash said, with the socket library compiled, that he |
39 |
would get the host working, and maybe look at CGI's for |
40 |
displaying service checks. |
41 |
|
42 |
AJ brought up the issue of configuration grouping. It was |
43 |
shown before that it was needed, but it could be done |
44 |
without. Now that service checks have been implemented it |
45 |
was becoming even more apparent that it was required. AJ |
46 |
said he would look into doing this. |
47 |
|
48 |
The group realised that not only was time running short, but |
49 |
everyone had a lot of other commitments too. The group |
50 |
agreed that completion of coding over the next week or two |
51 |
would be a good idea, as there are many other deliverables |
52 |
to be completed. |
53 |
|
54 |
There will be a meeting with Ian at 2.15 on Wednesday, and a |
55 |
usual meeting on Monday at 2.15 (we have DEFINATELY booked |
56 |
it this time). |