1 |
I-Scream Specification Outline (Realtime side only) |
2 |
=================================================== |
3 |
|
4 |
ajm4, 30/10/2000 |
5 |
tdb1, 30/10/2000 |
6 |
|
7 |
System Component Startup |
8 |
************************ |
9 |
|
10 |
CORE |
11 |
---- |
12 |
The core of the system provides little or no functionality |
13 |
to the operation of the system, but instead oversees the |
14 |
running. At startup this should be the first component to |
15 |
intansiate. It essentially acts as a central logging and |
16 |
configuration distrubution site, the "central" in |
17 |
centralised monitoring system. It may also be running the |
18 |
ORB or some components related to it. |
19 |
|
20 |
On startup the first thing it should do is read in any |
21 |
configuration files, start the logging interface then |
22 |
prepare to bring the system online. This is done by |
23 |
starting the various components. If however the system |
24 |
configuration states that particular components are |
25 |
operating in "distributed" mode, then it blocks until |
26 |
the various key components have registered that they are |
27 |
online. |
28 |
|
29 |
Client Interface |
30 |
---------------- |
31 |
The Client Interface is essentially just one component with |
32 |
a series of lists within it. When run it should, obviously, |
33 |
create an instance of the Client Interface, and then bind |
34 |
this to the ORB and register with the naming service. |
35 |
|
36 |
It can then read its configuration in from the CORE and get |
37 |
a hook on the logging service that the CORE provides. |
38 |
|
39 |
It then needs to construct the "local clients". These |
40 |
clients communicate with the system using the same interface |
41 |
as the external clients, but they are tailored to specific |
42 |
purposes, such as E-Mail alerts, and SMS alerts. The Client |
43 |
Interface then listens on a "well known" address for clients |
44 |
to request a connection. |
45 |
|
46 |
Filter |
47 |
------ |
48 |
The filter is broken down into three main subcomponents. |
49 |
|
50 |
- Filter Manager |
51 |
The Filter Manager is responsible for managing which |
52 |
filters are used by the hosts. The Filter Manager is |
53 |
available at a "well known" location which is pre- |
54 |
programmed into the hosts. The Filter Manager is |
55 |
responsible for creating and managing the other |
56 |
components of the filter system. |
57 |
|
58 |
- Main Filter |
59 |
The Main Filter is the single point that links back |
60 |
into the CORE of the system. It will connect to the |
61 |
DBI and the CLI to deliver data. |
62 |
|
63 |
- Filters |
64 |
There can be multipler Filters, and these are the |
65 |
"front line" to the hosts. They all link back to the |
66 |
Main Filter to send data into the system. It is |
67 |
possible to run these Filters on any machine, allowing |
68 |
management of data flow. |
69 |
|
70 |
At startup a Filter Manager object is activated at the "well |
71 |
known" location (probably a given machine name at a |
72 |
predefined port). The Filter Manager will create an instance |
73 |
of the Main Filter, and any Filters under it's control. It |
74 |
should also bind itself to the ORB and register with the |
75 |
naming service. |
76 |
|
77 |
It can then read its configuration in from the CORE and get |
78 |
a hook on the logging service that the CORE provides. |
79 |
|
80 |
Through some mechanism the other Filters, elsewhere on the |
81 |
network, will register with the Filter Manager. The Filter |
82 |
Manager will need to tell each Filter the location of the |
83 |
Main Filter upon registering. The Filter Manager will then |
84 |
be in a position to receive connections from hosts and pass |
85 |
them off to Filters. |
86 |
|
87 |
System Running State |
88 |
******************** |
89 |
|
90 |
CORE |
91 |
---- |
92 |
Once the various components are running then the core is |
93 |
essentially idle, logging information and handling |
94 |
configuration changes. |
95 |
|
96 |
Client Interface |
97 |
---------------- |
98 |
In the running state the Client Interface is always |
99 |
listening for clients on the "well known" address. When a |
100 |
connection is received it is passed in to the main Client |
101 |
Interface and the client is queried about which hosts it |
102 |
wishes to receive information about. This is then stored in |
103 |
an internal "routing table" so the Client Interface knows |
104 |
which hosts to send the information on to. This routing |
105 |
table is constructed with this form; |
106 |
|
107 |
host1: client1 client2 client5 |
108 |
host2: client2 |
109 |
host3: client3 client4 |
110 |
host4: client1 client3 |
111 |
|
112 |
This design is such that when a piece of information is |
113 |
recieved from a host the Client Interface can immediately |
114 |
see which clients wish to receive this data, without too |
115 |
much searching. |
116 |
|
117 |
The "local clients" function just like any other client, |
118 |
although they are local, in that they will wish to receive |
119 |
information about hosts they are interested in. However, |
120 |
they will contain a lot more logic, and be required to work |
121 |
out who wants to be alerted about what, and when. They will |
122 |
also be responsible for sending the alert. |
123 |
|
124 |
Filter |
125 |
------ |
126 |
When a host first loads up it knows where to locate the |
127 |
Filter Manager because it's located at a "well known" |
128 |
location. The host will fire up a TCP connection to the |
129 |
Filter Manager to announce itself. The Filter Manager will |
130 |
use some method (logically) to allocate a Filter to the |
131 |
host. The Filter Manager should base this decision on |
132 |
various factors, such as the load on the selection of |
133 |
filters, and possibly the location in relation to the host. |
134 |
The host will then be directed to this Filter for all |
135 |
further communications. |
136 |
|
137 |
As the system runs the host will send data with (maybe) UDP |
138 |
to the Filter (that it's been allocated to). This choice has |
139 |
been made because it puts less onus on the host to make the |
140 |
connection, rather the data is just sent out. However, to |
141 |
ensure that the data isn't just disappearing into the depths |
142 |
of the network a periodic heartbeat will occur (at a |
143 |
predefined interval) over TCP to the Filter. This heartbeat |
144 |
can be used as a form of two-way communication, ensuring |
145 |
that everything is ok, and if required, to send any |
146 |
information back to the host. This heartbeat must occur |
147 |
otherwise the server may infer the host has died. |
148 |
|
149 |
This could link in to alerting. An amber alert could be |
150 |
initiated for a host if the server stops receiving UDP |
151 |
packets, but an red alert be raised if the heartbeat doesn't |
152 |
occur. |
153 |
|
154 |
If, for some reason, the Filter were to disappear the host |
155 |
should fall back on it's initial discovering mechanism - ie. |
156 |
contacting the Filter Manager at it's "well known" location. |
157 |
The host should report that it's lost it's Filter (so the |
158 |
Filter Manager can investigate and remove from it's list of |
159 |
Filters), and then the Filter Manager will reassign a new |
160 |
Filter to the host. Communication can then continue. |
161 |
|
162 |
The idea of plugins to the Filters has been introduced. |
163 |
These plugins will implement a predefined plugin interface, |
164 |
and can be chained together at the Filter. Using the |
165 |
interface we can easily add future plugins that can do |
166 |
anything from parsing new data formats, to implementing |
167 |
encryption algorithms. The Filter will pass incoming data to |
168 |
each plugin in turn that it has available, and then finally |
169 |
pass the data on to the Main Filter. The Filter need not |
170 |
have any real knowledge about the content of the data. |